Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2015 Apr 18;2015:4151–4160. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702576

Table 2.

Participants grouped by attitude.

Attitude ID Age Gender Race Education
1 A3* 36 F Black HS
1 A9 36 F White 4YR
1 A1 38 F White 4 YR
1 A7 46 F Hispanic HS
1 D3 85 F Black +4YR
1 D9 88 F White Some HS
2 D1 69 F Hispanic +4YR
2 D2 82 F Black +4YR
3 D6 71 M White HS
3 D4 88 M White Some HS
4 A5t 31 F Black Some College
4 A2 38 F Black +4YR
4 A6 40 F White 4YR
4 A4 41 F White +4YR
4 A8 42 F Black +4YR
4 D7 73 M White HS
X D5 89 M Asian +4YR
X D8 74 M White Some College

X=confounded;

*

=low vision;

t

=low literacy.