Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;78(2):195–202. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.195

Table 2.

Descriptive characteristics of respondents from respondent family units (RFUs)

graphic file with name jsad.2017.78.195tbl2.jpg

Country (survey year) Participant n Response rate, % RFUs n Wtd. % of RFUs that are nonrural living Wtd. % of RFUs in income category
Wtd. % of RFUs reporting HD in household or that the respondent is an HED monthly or more frequently Wtd. % of single parent/sole carer RFUs
Low Middle High
Australia (2008) 2,649 35 1,142 85.4 16.4 36.8 25.2 41.4 7.0
Irelanda (2010) 1,008 b 694 63.3
Chile (2012–2013) 1,500 72 409 81.8 35.2 25.1 19.2 42.7 3.8
Thailand (2012–2013) 1,695 94 937 62.1 23.2 26.8 29.2 34.9 1.0
Sri Lanka (2013–2014) 2,475 93 1,251 26.7 26.4 31.6 32.2 32.7 2.4
Nigeria (2012–2013) 2,270 b 1,659 30.6 34.4 24.2 33.7 17.7 9.1
Vietnam (2012–2013) 1,501 99 961 29.9 33.4 31.8 28.7 38.6 3.2
LaoPDR (2013) 1,257 99 795 51.5 41.9 24.4 31.3 33.0 9.1

Notes: Wtd. = weighted; HD = heavy drinker; HED = heavy episodic drinker.

a

Weighted percentages are reported for all countries except Ireland.

b

Response rates were not calculable for Ireland because it was a panel sample nor for Nigeria, where information on nonrespondents was not collected.