. 2017 Mar 20;78(2):195–202. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.195

Table 4.

Logistic regression models predicting reporting of alcohol-related harm to children

	Australia		Chile		Thailand		Sri Lanka		Nigeria		Vietnam		Lao PDR
Variable	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b	%^a	OR^b
RFU lives in nonrural area
Rural	12.7	(ref.)	11.8	(ref.)	14.2	(ref.)	9.2	(ref.)	5.2	(ref.)	15.1	(ref.)	3.0	(ref.)
Nonrural	11.7	1.0	9.8	1.0	12.0	1.1	13.0	1.6^*	6.8	1.4	10.7	0.8	5.8	1.7
Household income^c
Low	16.4	(ref.)	14.2	(ref.)	18.0	(ref.)	10.3	(ref.)	4.3	(ref.)	18.5	(ref.)	3.5	(ref.)
Middle	10.6	0.6	9.7	0.6	16.9	0.8	11.2	0.9	8.6^*	2.2^*	13.3^*	0.8	5.2	1.5
High	12.9	0.7	8.8	0.5	10.9	0.5^*	8.3	0.7	4.3	1.2	10.8^**	0.7	4.6	1.0
Household type
Other	11.1	(ref.)	10.3	(ref.)	12.9	(ref.)	10.2	(ref.)	5.1	(ref.)	13.6	(ref.)	4.2	(ref.)
Single parent or sole carer	21.7^**	2.2^**	9.9	1.1	7.5	0.5	8.3	1.1	11.5^**	3.0^***	19.6	1.9	6.6	1.7
Presence of an HD in household
No (ref.)	7.6	(ref.)	4.55	(ref.)	8.9	(ref.)	5.0	(ref.)	3.3	(ref.)	7.9	(ref.)	2.4	(ref.)
Yes	17.9^***	2.9^***	18.1^***	4.9^***	20.2^***	2.5^***	20.9^***	5.2^***	16.8^***	6.4^***	23.1^***	3.3^***	8.6^***	3.9^***

Notes: OR = odds ratio; RFU = respondent family unit; ref. = reference; HD = heavy drinker.

^{^a}

Percentage reporting any alcohol-related harm to children (statistical significance in these columns is taken from bivariate odds ratios predicting any harm).

^{^b}

ORs are presented in relation to the ref. category; multivariate model with all variables presented in the table included.

^{^c}

Missing income data was included in the multivariate analyses but is not presented here; inclusion of imputed income data made no substantial difference.

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001.