Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 10;8:1406. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01406

Table 1.

Effects of SlFERL1-VIGS (virus-induced gene silencing) on major fruit ripening-related parameters.

Parameters CK VIGS Notes
Firmness (kg cm−2) 9.067 ± 0.794 7.8 ± 0.825** Cell wall metabolism-related parameter
Flavonoid content (μg g−1 FW) 1.782 ± 0.056 1.508 ± 0.079** Polyphenol metabolism-related compounds
Total phenol content (μg g−1 FW) 4.37 ± 0.66 3.5 ± 0.31**
Fructose content (mg g−1 FW) 15.36 ± 1.613 14.51 ± 1.524 Sugar metabolism-related compounds
Sucrose content (mg g−1 FW) 9.925 ± 0.842 7.472 ± 0.694**
Glucose content (mg g−1 FW) 33.029 ± 1.964 37.59 ± 2.511**
Total titratable acid content (%) 2.578 ± 0.064 2.786 ± 0.123 Acid metabolism-related parameter
Hydrazinecarboxamide 1.535 ± 0.035 1.665 ± 0.048 Aroma metabolism-related compounds (data are expressed as percentage of the total volatiles)
Acetaldehyde,hydroxy 3.13 ± 0.062 2.3 ± 0.0452
Silanediol, dimethyl 1.19 ± 0.086 1.855 ± 0.071**
2-Pentenal, (E) 0.175 ± 0.021 0.3 ± 0.056
2-Pentenal, (E) 1.985 ± 0.079 3.41 ± 0.096**
Oxime-,methoxy-phenyl 0.18 ± 0.056 0.435 ± 0.036**
Heptanal 0.2 ± 0.004 0.11 ± 0.014
α-Pinene 0.7 ± 0.003 0.53 ± 0.005**
2-Heptenal,(Z) 0.615 ± 0.063 0.575 ± 0.017
5-Hepten-2-ol, 6-methyl 0.29 ± 0.008 0.275 ± 0.021
D-Limonene 0.1 ± 0.002 0.87 ± 0.007**
1-Octanol 0.265 ± 0.014 0.36 ± 0.005
1,6-Octadien-3-ol,3,7-dimethyl 0.13 ± 0.005 0.21 ± 0.009
Nonanal 0.255 ± 0.002 0.385 ± 0.009
Methyl Salicylate 1.86 ± 0.042 2.285 ± 0.032**
2-Decenal,(E) 0.11 ± 0.004 0.16 ± 0.007
2,6-Octadienal,3,7-dimethyl 0.19 ± 0.002 0.15 ± 0.008
Tetradecane 0.105 ± 0.035 0.13 ± 0.006
Hexadecane 0.245 ± 0.007 0.275 ± 0.006
Phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) 0.008 ± 0.001 0.1 ± 0.003**
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester 0.07 ± 0.002 0.23 ± 0.006**

The SlFERL1-VIGS construct was transfected into tomato at 18 days post-anthesis. At 12 days after transfection, fruits were detached and analyzed. Values are means ± SD of two samples (each sample includes five fruits). Asterisks denote significant differences compared with the control sample (i.e., VIGS-C) at P < 0.01, using Student's t-test. C, control; FW, fresh weight.