Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2017 Jul;21(7):1964–1974. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1538-z

Table 3.

Longitudinal models on varenicline adherence and smoking abstinence

Adherence
Abstinence
OR p-value 95 % CI OR p-value 95 % CI
Treatment
  SC+TMa 0.87 .83 0.24, 3.09 0.62 .64 0.08, 4.54
  SC+TM+ABTb 0.70 .59 0.20, 2.53 5.51 .05 0.99, 30.58
Timec 0.09 <.001 0.03, .25 1.53 .62 0.28, 8.37
Time*Treatment
  SC+TM 0.81 .78 0.19, 3.51 0.17 .14 0.02, 1.84
  SC+TM+ABT 0.41 .26 0.09, 1.93 8.84 .07 0.84, 92.40
Adherence to varenicline at the same visit 2.01 .13 0.82, 4.90
Baseline heaviness of smoking Index 0.61 .09 0.35, 1.07
Baseline adherence self-efficacyd 2.20 <.001 1.43, 3.39
Independent housing 1.02 .97 0.34, 3.08 6.13 .07 0.84, 44.96

Individuals’ intercepts vary with a standard deviation of 2.04 (95 % Cl 1.59–2.63) in the adherence model and 2.13 (95 % Cl 1.43–3.18) in the abstinence model

Bold values are statistically significant (p < 0.05)

a

The SC+TM treatment condition is compared with SC

b

The SC+TM+ABT treatment condition is compared with SC

c

Time variable is coded to contrast weeks 1 and 12

d

Standardized scores were used for baseline heaviness of smoking index and adherence self-efficacy