Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2016 May 27;35(3):355–365. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1859-6

Table 1.

Recommendations for diagnosis and management of low risk tumors.

Recommendations for endoscopic management LEV GOR
Unifocal 3 B
Small lesions (<2cm) 3 C
Low-grade tumor on biopsy 3 B
Negative cytology 3 C
Complete visualization 3 B
Papillary tumor 3 B
Good compliance 3 B
Understanding of invasive and close follow-up 3 B
All other tumor or patients features should be treated only in very selected patients with endoscopic treatment Recommendations for imaging 3 B
Imaging should be performed for exclusion of endoscopic treatment 3 B
CT-Urography should be performed for staging 3 B
Retrograde urography should be performed during endoscopic evaluation 3 C
Recommendations for diagnostic ureteroscopy
Ureteroscopic inspection of UTUC alone, without biopsy, has a very limited role, thus, biopsies are recommended 3 B
Tumor architecture, multifocality, number of lesions, size of lesions and their localizations should be documented 3 C
Localizations should also be evaluated for accessibility (need for flexible ureteroscopy, percutaneous approach) 3 C
Cystoscopy should be performed to exclude bladder cancer (up to 15%) 3 B
Recommendations for biopsy
Retrograde pyelography should be performed 3 C
Ureteroscopy should be performed 3 B
Flexible Ureteroscopy has technical advantages, especially for performing biopsies 3 C
The percutaneous approach is reserved for special indications 3 B
The biopsy can be performed using cup biopsies or using the basket 3 C
Ureteroscopic biopsy should be performed before endoscopic treatment 3 C
Number of biopsies should be more than 1 3 C
Biopsy should distinguish between low and high-grade tumors 3 B
Grade is a surrogate marker. G1 correlates with low grade and low stage disease, whereas high grade correlates with high grade and high stage disease. 3 B
G2 alone is insufficient for the decision of endoscopic treatment, especially in elective cases. 3 B
The use of access sheets should be avoided during diagnostic approach 4 C
Recommendations for cytology and markers
Malignant tumor cells on urinary cytology suggest high grade / CIS disease 3 B
Cytology should be performed, because it can add information for decision making, however, voiding voided cytology is of little value. 3 C
Selective cytology from the upper tract should be considered to detect high grade and CIS 3 B
Urine markers like fluorescence in situ hybridization can increase sensitivity in experienced hands 3 C
Cytology should be done before using contrast agents and instrumentation because manipulation can lead to erroneous results 3 B

LEV = Level of evidence; GOR = Grade of recommendation