Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;27:74. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.74.7266

Table 3.

Association of some variables with respondents’ level of birth preparedness

Variables Well Prepared (n=148) Poorly Prepared (n=32) χ2 p-value
Age
≥20 7 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 9.233** 0.026*
21 – 25 60 (74.1) 21 (25.9)
26 – 30 56 (86.7) 9 (13.3)
31 – 35 25 (92.3) 2 (7.7)
Location settings
Urban 96 (85.0) 17 (15.0) 1.552 0.213
Rural 52 (77.6) 15 (22.4)
Tribe
Yoruba 134 (84.8) 24 (15.2) 22.708** <0.0001*
Ibo 11 (85.7) 2 (14.3)
Hausa/Fulani 0 (0.0) 6 (100.0)
Others 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Highest level of education
None 0 (0.0) 4 (100.0) 22.453** <0.0001*
Primary 15 (62.5) 9 (37.5)
Secondary 83 (86.0) 13 (14.0)
Tertiary/Postgraduate 50 (88.6) 6 (11.4)
Occupation
Unemployed 36 (81.0) 9 (19.0) 5.141 0.162
Unskilled 7 (66.7) 4 (33.3)
Skilled 71 (82.1) 16 (17.9)
Professionals 34 (91.7) 3 (8.3)
Aware of danger signs in pregnancy
No 28 (52.4) 25 (47.6) 44.395 <0.0001*
Yes 120 (94.5) 7 (5.5)
*

Statistically significant

**

Likelihood ratio value used