Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 13;23(6):370–376. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042219

Table 1.

Frequencies, rates and correlation of pedestrian distraction and risky behaviours at observed pedestrian MVC (PMVC) sites, Cluj County, Romania

Characteristics n Rate*
Total pedestrians observed 1711
Pedestrian distraction 107 6.3
Distracted by
 Child 2 0.1
 Other pedestrian 6 0.4
 Electronic—hand to head 79 4.6
 Electronic—headphones 1 0.1
 Electronic—manipulating device 18 1.1
 Reading 1 0.1
Pedestrian risky behaviours 416 24.3
 Unpredictable, partial use of crosswalk 210 15.2
 Illegal crossing—against red light, given red 3 0.5
 Illegal crossing—no crosswalk, midblock or did not use available crosswalk 203 11.9

Correlations at PMVC sites Pearson’s r p Value

Pedestrian distraction and risky behaviours 0.82 <0.01
Pedestrian distraction and average motor vehicle speed −0.19 0.06
Pedestrian risky behaviours and average motor vehicle speed −0.27 0.01
Pedestrian distraction and motor vehicle volume 0.16 0.10
Pedestrian risky behaviours and motor vehicle volume 0.01 0.90

Significant of bold values p<0.05.

*

Rate per 100 observed pedestrians.

Partial use of crosswalk=veers outside of crosswalk at start and/or end of crossing; denominator only includes sites with crosswalks.

Denominator includes only pedestrians at sites with traffic lights.