Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 13;23(6):370–376. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042219

Table 3.

RR of pedestrian risky crossing behaviours and distraction at pedestrian MVC locations, Cluj County, Romania, 2010

Site characteristic Distraction ZINB model
Risky behaviours ZINB model
Adjusted RR 95% CI Adjusted RR 95% CI
Intersection (ref=no) 1.03* 1.31 to 3.44
Average motor vehicle speed (per mile per hour increase) 0.95 0.88 to 1.01 0.93* 0.90 to 0.96
Distracted pedestrians (per pedestrian) 1.28* 1.21 to 1.35
Painted crosswalk (ref=no crosswalk and no crossing sign)
 Yes, with crossing sign 2.48* 1.21 to 5.07 0.72 0.47 to 1.11
 No, but has crossing sign 1.87 0.60 to 5.84 1.42 0.74 to 2.71
Bike lane or bike warning sign (ref=no) 0.36* 0.19 to 0.66
Pedestrians (per pedestrian) 0.88* 0.82 to 0.95 0.95* 0.92 to 0.99
*

p<0.05.

ZINB, zero-inflated negative binomial.