Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jun 29;178:355–362. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.040

Table 5.

Mediation Effects of Bullying on the Association between Sexual Identity and Alcohol Use Outcomes, Bisexual vs. Heterosexual Females in the 2015 National YRBS.

Electronic Bullying In-School Bullying
Effects Beta S.E.a 95% CI value p-value Beta S.E.a 95% CI value p-value
From Sexual Identity to Ever Drank
 Total effect 0.606 0.105 (0.405, 0.818) <0.001 0.604 0.105 (0.404, 0.816) <0.001
 Indirect effect via bullying 0.047 0.011 (0.029, 0.070) <0.001 0.059 0.015 (0.032, 0.090) <0.001
 Direct effect 0.559 0.108 (0.355, 0.776) <0.001 0.545 0.103 (0.350, 0.751) <0.001
From Sexual Identity to Age at First Drink (<13 vs 13+)
 Total effect 0.300 0.094 (0.130, 0.495) 0.001 0.296 0.095 (0.127, 0.492) 0.002
 Indirect effect via bullying 0.032 0.011 (0.011, 0.056) 0.005 0.013 0.008 (−0.001, 0.031) 0.102
 Direct effect 0.032 0.011 (0.095, 0.466) 0.005 0.283 0.096 (0.111, 0.481) 0.003
From Sexual Identity to Drank Alcohol, Last 30 Days
 Total effect 0.302 0.092 (0.126, 0.484) 0.001 0.301 0.092 (0.124, 0.480) 0.001
 Indirect effect via bullying 0.043 0.009 (0.027, 0.063) <0.001 0.049 0.120 (0.028, 0.074) <0.001
 Direct effect 0.260 0.094 (0.077, 0.446) 0.006 0.253 0.092 (0.073, 0.432) 0.006
From Sexual Identity to Binge Drank, Last 30 Days
 Total effect 0.197 0.078 (0.037, 0.345) 0.012 0.196 0.078 (0.040, 0346) 0.012
 Indirect effect via bullying 0.041 0.011 (0.023, 0.064) <0.001 0.056 0.014 (0.031, 0.085) <0.001
 Direct effect 0.156 0.08 (−0.009, 0.307) 0.053 0.139 0.081 (−0.024, 0.294) 0.084
a

Bootstrap derived standard errors (S.E.) and 95% confidence interval (CI); 10,000 bootstrap sample