Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 17;7(8):2651–2664. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.043836

Figure 8 .

Figure 8

(A and B) Mean ± SEM of MEN activity; (C and D) mean ± SEM of the IDH activity; and (E and F) mean ± SEM of G6PD activity, standardized by protein concentration (micrograms per milliliter) for adult male and female flies pooled across the eight DGRPi genetic backgrounds within each 3rd chromosome genotype. ANOVA was used to test the factor effects with an α of 0.05. Partial eta squared (ηp2) was calculated to quantify the effect of each factor. (A) Sex-by-cSOD activity, F1,265 = 31.8, P < 0.0001, ηp2 = 0.110. (B) Sex-by-cSOD activity, F1,280 = 10.5, P = 0.0013, ηp2 = 0.0363. (C) Sex-by-cSOD activity, F1,265 = 25.5, P < 0.0001, ηp2 = 0.0879. (D) Sex, F1,280 = 4.58, P = 0.0333, ηp2 = 0.0161. (E) Sex-by-cSOD activity, F1,265 = 19.6, P < 0.0001, ηp2 = 0.0690. (F) Sex, F1,280 = 155.2, P < 0.0001, ηp2 = 0.357. Brackets enclose significantly different groups. cSOD, cytosolic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; DGRPi, ; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MEN, malic enzyme.