Table 4.

Results of regression models for socioemotional outcomes among girls.

	10th grade not fitting		10th grade feelings of internalizing symptoms
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
9th grade version of outcome	.53***	.53***	.46***	.46***
	(.04)	(.04)	(.04)	(.04)
Obesity	.55	−.88	.04	.12
	(.73)	(.92)	(.13)	(.14)
Current family structure
Single parent familya	.58	.66	.32*	.39*
	(.71)	(.73)	(.15)	(.16)
Stepparent family	.68	1.24	.02	.11
	(.85)	(.95)	(.17)	(.19)
Other family type	.64	1.41	−.05	.04
	(1.40)	(1.53)	(.21)	(.23)
Family structure instabilityb	.15	.15	.01	−.05
	(.55)	(.55)	(.08)	(.09)
Obesity × family interaction
Obesity × instability		3.46**		.54*
		(1.21)		(.25)
Intercept	3.64***	3.74***	.51**	.50
	(1.00)	(.98)	(.19)	(.18)
R2	.34	.35	.29	.29
n	898	898	898	898

Source: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth).

Note: B coefficients presented with standard errors in parentheses. All models also controlled for race/ethnicity, immigration status, parent education, family income to needs, school sector, school size, school minority representation, and school socioeconomic composition. Model 2 also included interactions of obesity with the family structure dummy variables.

^aReference category for family structure dummy variables is two-parent.

^bFamily instability is a count of family structure transitions.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.

^***p < .001.