Table 2.
Concordance between coproparasitological techniques employed
| Techniques | Kappa index (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Infections with protozoa in general | |
| Paratest® and direct wet mount | 0.84 (0.69–0.99) |
| Paratest® and Ritchie | 0.81 (0.68–0.94) |
| Direct wet mount and Ritchie | 0.81 (0.68–0.94) |
| Infections with pathogenic protozoa | |
| Paratest® and direct wet mount | 0.75 (0.52–0.98)a |
| Paratest® and Ritchie | 0.94 (0.82–1.00) |
| Direct wet mount and Ritchie | 0.82 (0.62–1.00) |
| Infections with commensals | |
| Paratest® and direct wet mount | 0.87 (0.74–0.99) |
| Paratest® and Ritchie | 0.76 (0.60–0.91)a |
| Direct wet mount and Ritchie | 0.79 (0.65–0.94)a |
aDegree of agreement substantial or good, according to the classification by Landis and Koch