Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;41(3):718–722. doi: 10.1007/s12639-016-0876-0

Table 2.

Concordance between coproparasitological techniques employed

Techniques Kappa index (95% CI)
Infections with protozoa in general
 Paratest® and direct wet mount 0.84 (0.69–0.99)
 Paratest® and Ritchie 0.81 (0.68–0.94)
 Direct wet mount and Ritchie 0.81 (0.68–0.94)
Infections with pathogenic protozoa
 Paratest® and direct wet mount 0.75 (0.52–0.98)a
 Paratest® and Ritchie 0.94 (0.82–1.00)
 Direct wet mount and Ritchie 0.82 (0.62–1.00)
Infections with commensals
 Paratest® and direct wet mount 0.87 (0.74–0.99)
 Paratest® and Ritchie 0.76 (0.60–0.91)a
 Direct wet mount and Ritchie 0.79 (0.65–0.94)a

aDegree of agreement substantial or good, according to the classification by Landis and Koch