Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 18;41(3):718–722. doi: 10.1007/s12639-016-0876-0

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values obtained with coproparasitological techniques employed in the group of infected patients

Group of infections/techniques No. (%) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
Infections with protozoa in general (n = 32)
 Direct wet mount 25 (78.12) 68.13 (62.24–94.01) 100 (99.0–100) 100 (98.0–100) 87.72 (78.32–97.12)
 Paratest® 25 (78.12) 68.13 (62.24–94.01) 100 (99.0–100) 100 (98.0–100) 87.72 (78.32–97.12)
 Ritchie 32 (100) 100 (98.44–100) 100 (99.0–100) 100 (98.4–100) 100 (99.0–100)
P = 0.02
Infections with pathogenic protozoa (n = 10)
 Direct wet mount 8 (80.0) 80.00 (50.21–100) 100 (99.31–100) 100 (93.7–100) 97.30 (92.23–100)
 Paratest® 9 (90.0) 90.00 (66.41–100) 100 (99.31–100) 100 (94.4–100) 98.63 (95.28–100)
 Ritchie 10 (100) 100 (95–100) 100 (99.31–100) 100 (95–100) 100 (99.31–100)
P = 0.33
Infections with commensals (n = 26)
 Direct wet mount 21 (80.77) 80.77 (63.70–97.84) 100 (99.11–100) 100 (97.6–100) 91.80 (84.10–99.51)
 Paratest® 20 (76.92) 76.92 (58.81–95.04) 100 (99.11–100) 100 (97.5–100) 90.32 (82.16–98.49)
 Ritchie 26 (100) 100 (98.08–100) 100 (99.11–100) 100 (98.1–100) 100 (99.11–100)
P = 0.04

CI confidence intervals, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value