Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 4;8(10):1927–1934. doi: 10.7150/jca.17930

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with rectal cancer having different pathological tumor sizes following surgery

Pathological tumor size < 5 cm (n, %) Pathological tumor size ≥ 5 cm (n, %) P value
Upper-third rectum 40 (75.47%) 16 (24.53%) 0.368
Middle-third rectum 50 (56.18%) 39 (43.82%)
Lower-third rectum 44 (65.67%) 23 (34.33%)
Adjuvant CT (-) 71 (63.39%) 41 (36.61%) 0.778
Adjuvant CT (+) 72 (66.06%) 37 (33.94%)
Sphincter-saving procedure 137 (67.82%) 65 (32.18%) 0.002
APR 6 (31.58%) 13 (68.42%)
Adjuvant RT (-) 110 (59.17%) 59 (40.83%) 0.869
Adjuvant RT (+) 33 (63.46%) 19 (36.54%)
CRM negative 112 (56.00%) 88 (44.00%) 0.012
CRM positive 7 (33.33%) 14 (66.67%)
Neoadjuvant CCRT (-) 122 (64.21%) 68 (35.79%) 0.288
Neoadjuvant CCRT (+) 21 (63.74%) 10 (32.2%)
Pathological T1-3 140 (66.67%) 70 (33.33%) 0.001
Pathological T4 3 (27.27%) 8 (72.73%)
Pathological N0 81 (64.29%) 45 (35.71%) 0.888
Pathological N1-2 62 (65.26%) 33 (34.74%)
WD adenocarcinoma 31 (72.09%) 12 (27.91%) 0.100
MD adenocarcinoma 111 (63.79%) 63 (36.21%)
PD adenocarcinoma 0 (0.00%) 2 (100.00%)
LVI negative 85 (64.89%) 46 (35.11%) 0.763
LVI positive 52 (67.53%) 25 (32.47%)

APR, abdominal perineal resection; RT, radiotherapy; CT, chemotherapy; CRM: circumferential margin; WD, well-differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated; LVI, lymphatic vascular invasion; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy