Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2016 Aug 26;19(9):1142–1153. doi: 10.1038/nn.4359

Table 1.

Selected genetically encoded pH indicators (GEPIs)

GEPI ΔF/F,
pH 5.5 to pH
7.4
Brightness at
pH 5.5
(mM−1 cm−1)a
Brightness at
pH 7.4
(mM−1 cm−1)b
pKa Refs.
EGFP 5.0 6.4 32 6.0 30,124
Ecliptic pHluorin (EP) 50 0.070 3.5c 7.1 29,30
Superecliptic pHluorin (SEP) 50 0.44 22d 7.2 30
pHTomato 2.0 24 48 7.8 31,125
td-mOrange2 3.5 10 35 6.5 39,126,127
pHoran4 17 3.2 55 7.5 31
pHuji 20 0.34 6.8 7.7 31
a

Brightness at pH 5.5 was calculated from brightness at pH 7.4 (below) and reported ΔF/F.

b

Brightness at pH 7.4 was directly measured as product of peak extinction coefficient and quantum yield of mature protein measured at pH 7.4, unless otherwise indicated.

c

Brightness at pH 7.4 was estimated from relative brightness of EP upon 488-nm excitation at pH 7.4 vs. maximal observed brightness (at pH 8.5), with maximal brightness assumed to be similar to that of the parental wild-type GFP, which has a similar excitation spectrum shape. Brightness of wild-type GFP at 488 nm was derived from the published absorbance spectrum, extinction coefficient, and quantum yield124. Brightness of EP in cells relative to EGFP and SEP may be disproportionally low owing to absence of the F64L folding mutation.

d

Brightness at pH 7.4 was estimated from relative brightness of SEP upon 488-nm excitation at pH 7.4 vs. maximal observed brightness (at pH 9.5), with maximal brightness assumed to be similar to that of the parental EGFP, which has a similar excitation spectrum shape. Published measurements were used for the brightness of EGFP at 488 nm (ref. 124). Values were rounded to two significant digits.