Table S1.
Comparison of grading on penetration and residue scales for different liquid consistencies in each patient with abnormal findings in quantitative analysis
| ID no | Pharyngeal retention scale
|
Penetration scale
|
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thin | Thick | CTL | Δ thin–thick | Δ thin–CTL | Δ thick–CTL | Thin | Thick | CTL | Δ thin–thick | Δ thin–CTL | Δ thick–CTL | |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | −2 | −2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | −1 |
| 17 | 4 | 3 | 2 | −1 | −2 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1 | 2 | – | +1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | 0 | – | – |
| 21 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2 | 3 | 3 | +1 | +1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Abbreviations: thin, thin liquid; thick, thick liquid; CTL, carbonated thin liquid.