Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;8(3):135–144. doi: 10.1177/2151458517710517

Table 1.

Summary of Literature.

Authors Year n Type of Evidence Level Aim AO Fracture Classification Method of Fixation Findings Average Age
Smith et al 1997 51 Retrospective cohort series 3 Examined factors surrounding early failure of operative treatment of patella fracture C1 x 51 (9 with comminution) 38 TBW, Tensioned cable and K-wire in 11, TBW and cannulated screws x2 32 nonoperatively treated, TBW AO used in all but 3 cases, WBAT in extension brace, loss of reduction in 11 fractures, 9 patients required hardware removal, 4 complete failures due to patient noncompliance. 5 failures associated with technical aspects of the operation, that is, improper placement and not enough tension 48
Klassen 1997 20 Retrospective cohort series 3 Operative versus nonoperatively managed delayed union B type 4, C1.1 7, C1.2 x 4, C1.3 2, C3 x 3 TBW x 6, Bunnell wiring x 1, Cerclage x 1, Screw fixation x 1 With nonunion average age 38, nonoperative in 7, and operative in 13, 1 persistent nonunion, operative management on nonunion increases functional outcome scores and can be expected to unite 38
Shabat et al 2003 68 Retrospective cohort study 4 Examined causality, compared operative versus nonoperative patella fracture in older patients Surgical treatment better than nonsurgical
Shabat et al 2004 14 Retrospective case series 4 Outcomes of operatively managed primary patella fracture in elderly patients Not Stated—10 conservative, 58 operative, and 45 comminuted TBW Operatively treated patella fracture with tension band wiring followed by cast immobilization for 6 weeks, all patients > 80 years age, average 83.3, all patients treated with ORIF and TBW. Severe limitation of range of motion noted requiring extensive physio, only 4 patients regained full extension 83.3
Kastelec and Veselko 2004 28 Retrospective cohort series 3 Compared distal pole resection with ORIF with mesh for distal pole fractures C3.1 (excluded comminution) Mesh versus PP ORIF with Mesh had early ROM and weight bearing, better function outcomes and maintained patella ligament length. PP group had cast immobilization, worse functional outcome, and significantly shorter patella ligament Avg 55 Range 11-77
Huang et al 2012 3 Case series 4 Modified basket plate in inferior pole fractures C1.3 x 3 Mesh over inferior pole Good clinical outcomes in all patients, metalware removed in 1 patient 54, 87, and 89
Eggink and Jaarsma 2011 60 Retrospective cohort series 3 Compared proximal bend TBW with distal and proximal bend TBW C1 x 20, C2 x 9, C3 x 25, A1 x 6 TBW 60 total (40 followed up) 9 failures of fixation, 3 migration of K-wires, 6 insufficient tension, concluded that it is better to bend the K-wires proximally and distally 44.9
Dy et al 2012 24 studies Meta-analysis 3 Examined reoperation, nonunion and infection rates in patella fractures 737 patella fractures Not recorded 737 patella fractures, reoperation common in 33.6%, age gender, operative technique, or date of publication did not influence the result Not Specified
Lebrun16 2012 40 patients Case series 4 Obtained patient reported outcome scores post patella fracture C1 30%, C2 15%, C3 55% TBW+Kwire 15, TBW through screws 10, longtidutinal anterior banding 2, PP 13 27 operated, 14 required hardware removal, study e-mailed questionnaires to patients then reviewed them 46.3
Miller et al 2012 13 failures Retrospective cohort series 4 Factors predicting failure of fixation Type Ax1, Type Bx0 Type C x 12 Screws and K-wires 13 patients with failure of fixation examined, concluded that screws with wire is at least as good as TBW/K wire 65 in failure group
Lazaro et al 2013 30 Retrospective case series 4 Outcomes of operatively managed primary patella fracture C1.3 x 2 C2.1 x 2 C2.2 x 2 C2.3 x 2 C3.1 x 11 C3.2 x 11 12-month follow-up of 30 patella fractures, found significant functional impairment after surgery 60.2
Taylor et al 2014 8 Case series 4 Plating of patella fractures techniques and outcomes C3 x 6 X-Plate 5 fractures, Mesh 2 All patients healed without complication, 1 small undisplaced fragment in 1 patient 47.4
Hao et al 2015 29 Prospective case series 4 Outcomes claw fixation of patella fracture C1 and C2 Ti, Ni, SMA claw fixation memory alloy fixation Ti, Ni, SMA claw fixation in 34-C1 and 34-C2 type fractures. Average age 43, Follow-up 11.48 months, No complications of management 43
Houdek et al 2015 113 Retrospective cohort study 3 Effects of previous patella fracture on TKA Not specified ORIF, PP, TP, and CM Previous patella fracture leads to higher rates of MUA, limited ROM, and atherofibrosis. No increased revision rate 67
Kadar et al 2015 188 Retrospective case series 4 Predictors of nonunion, reoperation, and infection A1 x 9 C1 x73, C1.2/1.3 x65 C3 x 33, Bx8 Average follow-up 908 days, 6.9 (13p) infection, 1.6 (3p) nonunion, 42% required second operation, TBW more frequently associated with requiring a second operation. History of CVA increase risk of infection -old and nonunion 14-fold, Diabetics 8 × more likely to develop infection 56
Bonnaig 2014 52 Retrospective cohort study 3  Compared partial patellectomy with ORIF C1.1 x 19 C1.2 x 26 C3 x5 Partial patellectomy or TBW with K-wires/Cannulated Screws 26 patella plasty and 26 ORIF, no significant difference in the functional outcome scores for both groups, both did poorly 43.8 PP and 44.8 ORIF
Lorich et al 2015 9 Retrospective case series 4 Mesh plating 2 x 34 C1 7 x 34 C3 Synthes 2.4 mm Mesh Allowed full weight bearing, ROM allowed at 4 weeks. 2 × Contralateral DVT, Mean time to union of 23 weeks and all achieved union Avg 65 Range 50 to 86
Chen et al 2013 25 Matched cohort 3 Transosseous-braided suture 14 x C1 2 x C2 9 x C3 No.5 Ticron suture Varied to surgeon preference, splinted for 0 to 6 weeks 59.6
RCT in Cochrane review
Juutilainen17 1995 9 RCT 1 See Cochrane review for full assessment Prospective RCT, biodegradable versus metallic, polyglycolide acid screws and biodegradable wire. Excluded fractures with more than 3 fragments, all metallic implants removed after 1 year
Gunal18 1997 28 RCT 1 See Cochrane review for full assessment 12 patellectomy with advancement, 18 patelectomy, Mean age 28.3, All communited fractures. Follow-up mean 4.2 years. Nonvalidated scoring system 28.3
Chen19 1998 38 RCT 1 See Cochrane review for full assessment 2 years follow-up, RCT (used biopoly and biofix anchors, compared to metal. Severely comminuted fractures excluded). No grading of patella fracture, No difference found between the 2 groups 46
Luna-Pizzaro et al 2006 53 RCT 1 See Cochrane review for full assessment 26 PCOS and 26 Standard. Excluded comminuted, fragmented, or osteoporotic patients by design. Less pain and better early results with PCOS Percutaneous fixation versus open, follow-up 2 years, Average age 47 (16-74), Used AO classification, only dealt with transverse and distal type fractures 47
Mao et al 2013 39 RCT 1 See Cochrane review for full assessment Age 18 to 65 (Avg 41.8) Percutaneous fixation using cable pin system versus standard. 20 percutaneous, 19 open. Excluded comminuted fractures 41.8

Abbreviations: AO, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen; CM, Conservative management; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; MUA, Manipulation under anesthesia; ORIF, open reduction internal fixation; PCOS, percutaneous osteosynthesis; PP, Partial patellectomy; RCT, randomized control trial; ROM, range of motion; TBW, tension band wire; TP, Total patellectomy; WBAT, Weight bear as tolerated.