Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;12(8):e0183318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183318

Table 2. Comparison of PRmePRed with other prediction methods.

Method (yr. developed) Algorithm MCC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity
MeMo (Chen et al. 2006)[26] SVM 0.462 0.6839 0.3811 0.987
MASA (Shien et al. 2009)[4] SVM 0.411 0.6503 0.3095 0.991
BPB-PPMS (Shao et al. 2009)[27] SVM 0.253 0.5601 0.1202 1.000
PMeS (Shi et al. 2012)[12] SVM 0.159 0.5756 0.4253 0.726
iMethyl-PseAAC (2014)[28] SVM 0.302 0.5866 0.1768 0.997
PSSMe (Wen et al. 2016) [29] SVM 0.444 0.7162 0.6003 0.832
MePred-RF (Wei et al. 2017) [30] RF 0.462 0.6908 0.4095 0.972
PRmePRed (2017) SVM 0.737 0.8683 0.8709 0.866