Table 2. Comparison of PRmePRed with other prediction methods.
Method (yr. developed) | Algorithm | MCC | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MeMo (Chen et al. 2006)[26] | SVM | 0.462 | 0.6839 | 0.3811 | 0.987 |
MASA (Shien et al. 2009)[4] | SVM | 0.411 | 0.6503 | 0.3095 | 0.991 |
BPB-PPMS (Shao et al. 2009)[27] | SVM | 0.253 | 0.5601 | 0.1202 | 1.000 |
PMeS (Shi et al. 2012)[12] | SVM | 0.159 | 0.5756 | 0.4253 | 0.726 |
iMethyl-PseAAC (2014)[28] | SVM | 0.302 | 0.5866 | 0.1768 | 0.997 |
PSSMe (Wen et al. 2016) [29] | SVM | 0.444 | 0.7162 | 0.6003 | 0.832 |
MePred-RF (Wei et al. 2017) [30] | RF | 0.462 | 0.6908 | 0.4095 | 0.972 |
PRmePRed (2017) | SVM | 0.737 | 0.8683 | 0.8709 | 0.866 |