Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2017 May 11;24(9):1139–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.013

Table 2.

Comparison of histologic and mammographic features of the DCIS and invasive groups.

Feature DCIS (74) Invasion (25) p-value

Age 59.8 58.2 p ≤ 0.5330

Histologic Nuclear grade (1–3) 2.51 2.58 p ≤ 0.6044

    1 6 3

    2 27 6

    3 41 16

Subtype of DCIS p ≤ 0.5250

    Comedo 36 14

    Non-Comedo 38 11

Radiologist-A Radiologist-B

Mammographic Size of lesion

  Area (mm^2) 210.3 369.0 p ≤ 0.2257 182.5 442.9 p ≤ 0.0305 *
  Major Axis (mm) 16.7 24.8 p ≤ 0.0496 * 17.3 25.4 p ≤ 0.0345 *

Morphology of calcifications p ≤ 0.0704 p ≤ 0.8690

    Low Risk (Typically benign) 0 1 0 0

    Medium Risk (Amorphous/Coarse heterogeneous) 41 7 16 5

    High Risk (Fine pleomorphic/Fine linear) 33 17 58 20

Distribution of calcifications p ≤ 0.6653 p ≤ 0.2056

    Regional 2 0 11 3

    Segmental 5 3 3 4

    Linear 2 1 15 7

    Clustered 65 21 45 11

BI-RADS level of suspicion p ≤ 0.0247 * p ≤ 0.0321*

     4a 40 7 1 1

     4b 17 8 35 6

     4c 14 8 23 7

     5 3 2 15 11

Radiologist’s score of being invasive 14.5 21.0 p ≤ 0.0052 * 32.2 35.4 p ≤ 0.4965
*

Difference for the comparison was statistically significant.