Table 1.
Method | Advantage | Limitation | Current improvement | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Physical properties | Size/ deformability based filtration | Easy to use High throughput High CTC cluster capture efficacy |
Loss of CTCs with size equal to and smaller than pore size of filter Low purity CTC damage due to hemodynamic stress |
Introduce CTC size-amplification strategy to reduce the loss of CTC with small size Employ 3D filter to improve cell viability Use microfluidic devices to reduce shear forces and to exclusively enrich clusters |
Density-gradient centrifugate | Easy to use High throughput |
Loss of CTCs with high density Low purity |
Depletion of leukocytes by bi-specific antibodies to improve purity Integrate filter into centrifuge tube to reduce the loss of cluster and CTC with large size Use microfluidic devices designed with inertial focusing and vortex function |
|
Electric property based dielectro-phoresis | High CTC viability | Loss of CTCs with electrical property similar to leukocytes Low purity |
||
Biological properties | Positive selection | High purity | Loss of CTC subpopulations including EMTed CTCs, clusters, and CTCs cloaked by blood cells Tumor-specific assays may be required since CTC phenotype varies by cancer type and over disease progression and treatment course |
Search new markers, e.g. actin bundling protein plastin 3 Utilize combination of antibodies Use microfluidic devices integrated with micromixer to increase capture efficacy |
Negative selection | Potential to enrich all CTC subpopulations | Low purity | Introduce microfluidic devices to improve purity |