Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F

Table 5.

Success rates* of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) with and without 15 potentially important features. Results of 71 control-CDSS comparisons

%success rate (95% CI)
Feature Feature prevalence (%) With feature Without feature Rate difference (95% CI)
General system features
Integration with charting or order entry system 85 73 (61 to 84) 36 (14 to 67) 37 (6 to 61)†
Computer based generation of decision support 69 76 (62 to 87) 50 (28 to 72) 26 (2 to 49)†
Local user involvement in development process 7 40 (8 to 81) 70 (58 to 80) −30 (−61 to 11)
Clinician-system interaction features
Automatic provision of decision support as part of clinician workflow 90 75 (63 to 85) 0 (0 to 38) 75 (37 to 84)†
Provision at time and location of decision making 89 73 (61 to 83) 25 (5 to 65) 48 (0 to 70)‡
Request documentation of reason for not following system recommendations 21 100 (79 to 100) 59 (45 to 72) 41 (19 to 54)†
No need for additional clinician data entry 89 71 (59 to 82) 38 (11 to 71) 34 (−2 to 61)
Recommendations executed by noting agreement 13 78 (44 to 96) 66 (54 to 77) 12 (−23 to 34)
Communication content features
Provision of a recommendation, not just an assessment 76 76 (63 to 86) 41 (18 to 66) 35 (8 to 58)†
Promotion of action rather than inaction 92 68 (56 to 78) 67 (27 to 94) 1 (−27 to 40)
Justification via provision of research evidence 7 100 (50 to 100) 65 (53 to 76) 35 (−13 to 48)
Justification via provision of reasoning 39 75 (56 to 89) 63 (47 to 76) 12 (−11 to 34)
Auxiliary features
Provision of decision support results to both clinicians and to patients 10 86 (45 to 99) 66 (54 to 77) 20 (−23 to 39)
CDSS accompanied by periodic performance feedback 4 67 (14 to 98) 68 (55 to 78) −1 (−50 to 31)
CDSS accompanied by conventional education 31 55 (33 to 74) 73 (60 to 84) −19 (−42 to 4)

* Success defined as statistically and clinically significant improvement in clinical practice. †Difference between success rates statistically significant. ‡Lower bound of 95% confidence interval=−0.46%.