Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;7:8479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08852-8

Table 4.

Summary of meta-analyses focused on MRI and PET/CT for the assessment of breast cancer response to NAC.

Study Search date No. Modality PSEN (95% CI) PSPE (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Michae l7 to 2011 44 MRI 0.92(0.85–0.97) 0.60(0.39–0.96) 17.89(11.45, 27.95) 0.88(NR)
Mghanga8 2000–2012 15 PET/CT 0.81(0.76, 0.85) 0.79(0.74, 0.83) NR 0.88(0.86–0.90)
Liu24 1992–2015 6 MRI 0.65(0.45, 0.80) 0.88(0.75, 0.95) NR 0.84(0.80, 0.87)
6 PET/CT 0.86(0.76, 0.93) 0.72(0.49, 0.87) NR 0.88(0.85, 0.91)
Our 2000–2016 11 MRI 0.79(0.76, 0.87) 0.82(0.72, 0.89) 16.43(10.05, 26.87) 0.87(0.84, 0.90)
11 PET/CT 0.87(0.71, 0.95) 0.85(0.70, 0.93) 37.25(17.01, 81.62) 0.93(0.90, 0.95)

PSEN = pooled sensitivities; PSPE = pooled specificities; DOR = diagnostic odds ratio; NR = not reported.