Skip to main content
. 2017 May 6;12(6):821–836. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1668-y

Table 1.

Critical appraisal

References Study design Patient selection Threshold Blinded index test results Valid reference test Disease progression Verification Withdrawal Risk of bias Representative patient sample Extractable data Applicability
I-FABP Block et al. [37] Cohort Low Moderate
Cronk et al. [40] Cohort Low High
Güzel et al. [41] Case–control Moderate High
Kanda et al. [15]a Case–control Moderate High
Kanda et al. [42] Cohort Low High
Kittaka et al. [43] Cohort Low High
Matsumoto et al. [44] Cohort Low High
Matsumoto et al. [45] Cohort Low High
Shi et al. [38] Cohort Low High
Thuijls et al. [46] Cohort Low High
Uzun et al. [47] Case–control High High
Vermeulen et al. [48] Cohort Low High
Voort et al. [39]a Cohort Low Moderate
Camkiran et al. [49] Cohort High Low
Lieberman et al. [50]a Case–control High Low
d-Lactate Assadian et al. [51] Cohort Low High
Block et al. [37] Cohort Low High
Collange et al. [52] Cohort Low Low
Murray et al. [53] Case–control Moderate High
Poeze et al. [21] Case–control High High
Shi et al. [38] Cohort Low High
Voort et al. [39]a Cohort Low Moderate
α-GST Block et al. [37] Cohort Low High
Delaney et al. [54] Case–control Low High
Gearhart et al. [55] Cohort Low High
IMA Gunduz et al. [56] Case–control Low High
Polk et al. [57] Cohort Low High
C Kulu et al. [58] Case–control Low High

Patient selection: ● consecutive order, well described in- and exclusion criteria ◐ case–control with consecutive case selection ○ inappropriate exclusions. Threshold: ● based on ROC-analysis ◐ pre-specified ○ not reported. |Blinded index test results: ● yes ○ no/not reported. Valid reference standard: ● surgery, endoscopy, autopsy, full clinical recovery ◐ CT scanning, lab findings ○ none/not reported. Disease progression: ● < 12 h ○ ≥ 12 h/not reported. Verification: ●all patients received both index and reference test. Reference test was the same for all patients ◐ selected patients received equal reference tests ○ selected patients received different reference tests. Withdrawal: ● no loss to follow up ◐loss to follow up, reasons given ○ loss to follow up without reasons given/not reported. Representative patient sample: ● patients with suspected AMI ◐ healthy control group ○ non-matching domain. Extractable data: ● 2 × 2 table data extractable ◐ levels of biomarkers reported, no 2 × 2 data extractable ○ only correlation, no data on AMI

aArticles found by hand searching