Skip to main content
. 2017 May 6;12(6):821–836. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1668-y

Table 3.

Data analysis

Mean controla Mean AMIb p value Cut-off level TP FP TN FN PPVc NPVd
I-FABP Uden kit (ng/mL)
 Block et al. [37] 0.050 (0.0–0.197) 0.186 (0.0–0.613) 0.58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
 Cronk et al. [40] 0.281 1.772 N/A 0.1 3 4 14 0 0.43 (0.10–0.82) 1.00 (0.77–1.00)
 Güzel et al. [41] 0.08 (0.01–0.20) 0.421 (0.040–5.0) <0.001 0.09 24 0 30 3 1.00 (0.86–1.00) 0.09 (0.02–0.24)
 Thuijls et al. [46]f 0.109 [0.04–1.691] 0.653 [0.04–74.711] 0.02 0.268 15 7 17 7 0.68 (0.45–0.86) 0.71 (0.49–0.87)
 Uzun et al. [47] 0.170 ± 0.543 0.709 ± 0.669 N/A 0.145 5 9 155 2 0.36 (0.13–0.65) 0.99 (0.95–1.00)
 Vermeulen Windsant et al. [48] N/A N/A N/A 0.815 4 0 92 0 1.00 (0.40–1.00) 1.00 (0.96–1.00)
 van der Voort et al. [39]f 1.020 2.872 0.98 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I-FABP Osaka kit (ng/mL)
 Kanda et al. [15] 25.1 ± 3.6 265.8 ± 111.3 <0.0 100 7 0 48 6 1.00 (0.59–1.00) 0.89 (0.77–0.96)
 Kanda et al. [42] 5.8 ± 15.6 40.7 ± 117.9 <0.0001 3.1 41 81 228 11 0.34 (0.25–0.43) 0.95 (0.92–0.98)
 Kittaka et al. [43] 1.6 18.5 <0.001 6.5 15 1 15 6 0.94 (0.70–1.00) 0.71 (0.48–0.89)
 Matsumoto et al. [44] 2.5 (0.2–56.7) 31.0 (1.1–498.4) <0.01 9.1 20 13 109 4 0.61 (0.42–0.77) 0.96 (0.91–0.99)
 Matsumoto et al. [45] 3.2 [1.7–6.7] 15.5 [5.3–52.9] <0.001 9.7 19 6 37 8 0.76 (0.59 – 0.87) 0.82 (0.72 – 0.89)
 Shi et al. [38] 33.9 ± 12.6 113.8 ± 46.3 <0.001 93.07 30 59 174 9 0.34 (0.24–0.45) 0.95 (0.91–0.98)
d-Lactate (mmol/L)
 Block et al. [37] 0.03 (0.02–0.07) 0.05 (0.03–0.10) 0.20 0.20 9 47 14 1 0.16 (0.08–0.28) 0.93 (0.68–1.00)
 Shi et al. [38]f 0.15 ± 0.06 0.66 ± 0.29 <0.001 0.38 26 33 200 13 0.44 (0.31–0.58) 0.94 (0.90–0.97)
 van der Voort et al. [39]e 0.65 [0.37–0.94] 0.79 (0.49–1.16) 0.003g N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
0.41 [0.11–0.75] 0.56 (0.27–0.77) 0.46h
 Murray et al. [53]f 0.12 ± 0.04 0.36 ± 0.04 <0.0005 0.22 8 1 19 3 0.89 (0.52–1.00) 0.86 (0.65–0.97)
 Assadian et al. [51] 1.25 ± 0.61 3.03 ± 1.65 0.035 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
 Poeze et al. [21] 0.21 ± 0.06 0.32 ± 1.0 <0.01 0.2 9 3 10 2 0.75 (0.43–0.95) 0.83 (0.52–0.98)
α-GST (ng/ml)
 Block et al. [37] 1.3 (1.1–2.8) 1.7 (0.7–4.2) 0.21 4 2 9 53 8 0.18 (0.02–0.52) 0.87 (0.76–0.94)
 Gearhart et al. [55] 2.2 (1.0–3.0) 22.2 (7.0–126.0) 0.001 4 25 4 15 10 0.86 (0.68–0.96) 0.60 (0.39–0.79)
 Delaney et al. [54] 1.6 (0.8–2.2) 75.8 (22.4–153.0) <0.0001 4 12 2 12 0 0.86 (0.57–0.98) 1.00 (0.74–1.00)
IMA (ABSU)
 Polk et al. [57] 0.31 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.04 <0.0002 0.35 12 2 12 0 0.86 (0.57–0.98) 1.00 (0.74–1.00)
 Gunduz et al. [56] 0.163 ± 0.025 0.264 ± 0.057 0.003 0.188 6 1 7 0 0.86 (0.42–1.00) 1.00 (0.59–1.00)
Citrulline (nmol/ml)
 Kulu et al. [58] 32.8 ± 3.0 21.7 ± 3.1 0.01 15.8 9 0 25 14 1 0.64 (0.56–0.71)

N/A not applicable, TP true positive, TN true negative, FP false positive, FN false negative, ABSU absorbance units

aNumbers between brackets represent 95% confidence intervals. Means are presented with standard deviation

bAcute mesenteric ischemia

cPositive predictive value

dNegative predictive value

eMedian [IQR] are presented

fValues were converted to mmol/L by multiplying by 0.0111

gIschemia vs. non-ischemia

hIschemia-likely vs. ischemia-unlikely