Skip to main content
. 2017 May 6;12(6):821–836. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1668-y

Table 4.

Meta-analysis

No. of studies Sensitivity I 2 (%) p value Specificity I 2 (%) p value Positive LRa I 2 (%) p value Negative LR I 2 (%) p value
I-FABP (Uden kit) 4 0.790 (0.665–0.885) 16 0.312 0.913 (0.870–0.946) 82 0.001 6.368 (2.100–18.534) 79 0.003 0.262 (0.130–0.543) 41 0.146
I-FABP (Osaka kit) 6 0.750 (0.679–0.812) 0 0.463 0.792 (0.762–0.820) 87 0.000 4.577 (2.910–7.197) 75 0.001 0.321 (0.249–0.413) 0 0.629
d-lactate 3 0.717 (0.586–0.825) 20 0.288 0.742 (0.690–0.790) 98 0.000 3.621 (0.770–17.035) 97 0.000 0.371 (0.249–0.552) 0 0.845
α-GST 3 0.678 (0.542–0.795) 88 0.000 0.842 (0.753–0.909) 0 0.792 3.27 (1.50–7.16) 27 0.252 0.40 (0.11–1.49) 90 0.000
IMA 2 0.947 (0.740–0.999) 0 0.739 0.864 (0.651–0.971) 0 0.906 6.931 (2.37–24.24) 0 0.935 0.064 (0.02–0.48) 0 0.742

Numbers between brackets represent 95% confidence intervals

I 2 inconsistency (I-square)

aLikelihood ratio