Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;8:1308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01308

Table 3.

Hierarchical regressions predicting speech recognition performance in SSN, 4TB conditions with and without noise reduction processing.

Step 1
Step 2
b SE b β b SE b β
In SSN condition without noise reduction
Constant -8.67 1.05 -9.93 1.36
Age 0.076 0.01 0.30∗∗∗ 0.07 0.02 0.27∗∗∗
Lexical decision speed test 0.002 0.001 0.17
Semantic word-pair Span test -0.02 0.03
R2 = 0.10 for step 1, change in R2 = 0.03 for step 2 (p < 0.05)
In 4TB condition without noise reduction
Constant -3.10 1.07 -3.91 1.40
Age 0.07 0.02 0.30 0.06 0.02 0.25∗∗∗
Lexical decision speed test 0.002 0.001 0.17
Semantic word-pair Span test -0.04 0.03 -0.10
R2 = 0.09 for step 1, change in R2 = 0.04 (p < 0.05)
In SSN condition with noise reduction
Constant -12.92 1.16 -14.12 1.47
Age 0.07 0.02 0.27∗∗∗ 0.06 0.01 0.21
Lexical decision speed test 0.003 0.001 0.24∗∗∗
Semantic word-pair Span test -0.06 0.09 -0.15
R2 = 0.07 for step 1, change in R2 = 0.09 (p < 0.001)
In 4TB condition with noise reduction
Constant -9.91 1.06 -11.02 1.35
Age 0.08 0.02 0.31∗∗∗ 0.07 0.02 0.27∗∗∗
Lexical decision speed test 0.002 0.001 0.20
Semantic word-pair Span test -0.04 0.03 -0.10
R2 = 0.10 for step 1, change in R2 = 0.05 (p < 0.01)

b = unstandardized coefficients; SE b = standard errors; β = standardized coefficients; ΔR2 = change in R2p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure