Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;8(11):2079–2087. doi: 10.7150/jca.19181

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate cox hazards analysis for overall survival in 539 patients with HCC

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variables HR 95%CI p value* HR 95%CI p value*
Gender
Male vs. Female 1.041 0.681-1.191 0.854 1.214 0.657-2.242 0.537
Age (years)
<53 vs.≥53 0.911 0.697-1.190 0.492 1.206 0.818-1.778 0.345
TNM stage
III-IV vs. I-II 4.387 3.290-5.849 0.000
Tumor size(cm)
<5 vs.≥5 4.267 3.220-5.654 0.000 4.399 2.838-6.817 0.000
Tumor number
Single vs. Multiple 1.853 1.410-2.436 0.000 0.737 0.488-1.115 0.149
Node stage
N0 vs. N1-2 2.293 1.487-3.536 0.000 1.513 0.753-3.040 0.245
Distant metastases
Yes vs. No 1.899 1.172-3.077 0.009 1.211 0.522-2.811 0.655
BMI (kg/m2)
≥24.0 vs. 18.5-23.9 vs. <18.5 0.793 0.634-0.992 0.042 0.977 0.721-1.324 0.880
Alcohol behavior
Yes vs. No 1.000 0.757-1.321 0.999
Family history of cancer
Yes vs. No 0.732 0.527-1.017 0.063
HBV DNA
<103 vs. ≥103 2.010 1.349-2.993 0.001 1.830 1.190-2.814 0.006
AFP
<400 vs. ≥400 2.066 1.564-2.729 0.000 1.519 1.038-2.224 0.031
PT
<12.1 vs. ≥12.1 1.787 1.359-2.350 0.000 1.661 1.125-2.451 0.011
APTT
<25.6 vs. ≥25.6 1.416 1.082-1.854 0.011 1.457 0.982-2.161 0.061
Fbg
<2.83 vs. ≥2.83 2.794 2.102-3.714 0.000 2.158 1.427-3.263 0.000
TT
<18.4 vs. ≥18.4 1.009 0.772-1.319 0.948
PLT
<178 vs. ≥178 1.850 1.389-2.464 0.000 1.081 0.706-1.656 0.720

HR, Hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval;

*Cox hazard regression model.