Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2017 Feb 24;20(2):256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.01.004

Table 2.

Comparison of Standardized Associations* of DXA-VAT and CT-VAT with Glucose Metabolism Markers, Lipid Levels and Inflammatory Serum Markers, Adjusted for Age and Enrollment Site

Marker Log DXA-VAT Log CT-VAT Chi-squared (P-Value)
Parameter Coefficient Change in R-Squaredˆ Parameter Coefficient Change in R-Squaredˆ
Log Homa2-ir
(n=983)
0.50
(0.43, 0.56)
0.213 0.45
(0.40, 0.51)
0.171 4.38
(0.04)
Log Fasting
Insulin
(n=1015)
0.49
(0.44, 0.55)
0.229 0.45
(0.40, 0.50)
0.184 5.72
(0.02)
Log HDL
(n=1042)
0.31
(−0.36, −0.25)
0.091 0.28
(−0.34, −0.22)
0.074 2.77
(0.10)
Log
Triglycerides
(n=1042)
0.35
(0.30,0.40)
0.117 0.36
(0.30, 0.41)
0.120 0.23
(0.63)
LDL
(n=1042)
0.04
(−0.01 to 0.10)
0.002 0.03
(−0.03, 0.09)
0.001 0.38
(0.54)
TNF-alpha**
(n = 225)
0.17
(0.06, 0.27)
0.026 0.15
(.04, .26)
0.021 0.46
(0.50)
Log IL-6
(n=223)
0.25
(0.11, 0.38)
0.056 0.20
(0.07, 0.32)
0.037 1.41
(0.24)
Log CRP
(n=225)
0.24
(0.11, 0.36)
0.051 0.18
(0.05, 0.32)
0.033 1.63
(0.20)
*

Number of standard deviations change of VAT per standard deviation change of predictor. Associations significant at <0.05 are in bold

**

The standardized TNF-alpha variable was created using the square-root of TNF-alpha

ˆ

Incremental increase in variance of marker explained (R-Squared) when VAT is added to base model with covariates age and study enrollment site

Chi-squared and P-value to test hypothesis that parameter coefficients for DXA-VAT and CT-VAT are the same (modified Hausmann test using suest command of Stata)