Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Densitom. 2017 Feb 24;20(2):256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.01.004

Table 3.

Comparison of Standardized Associations* of DXA-VAT and CT-VAT with Glucose Metabolism Markers, Lipid Levels, and Inflammatory Serum Markers, Adjusted for Age, BMI, and Enrollment Site

Marker Log DXA-VAT Log CT-VAT Chi-sqared
(P-Value)
Parameter Coefficient Change in R-Squaredˆ Parameter Coefficient Change in R- Squaredˆ
Log Homa2-ir
(n=982)
0.38
(0.28, 0.47)
0.061 0.30
(0.24, 0.37)
0.056 4.67
(0.03)
Log Fasting
Insulin
(n=1014)
0.37
(0.29, 0.45)
0.063 0.30
(0.24, 0.36)
0.056 7.58
(0.006)
Log HDL
(n=1041)
0.29
(−0.38, −0.21)
0.040 0.22
(−0.29, −0.15)
0.031 7.92
(0.005)
Log
Triglycerides
(n=1041)
0.35
(0.28, 0.43)
0.058 0.32
(0.25, 0.38)
0.065 2.22
(0.14)
LDL
(n=1041)
0.11
(0.02, 0.20)
0.005 0.06
(−0.02, 0.13)
0.002 3.33
0.07
TNF-alpha
(n = 225)
0.13
(−0.04, 0.30)
0.007 0.10
(−0.03, 0.23)
0.006 0.32
(0.57)
Log IL-6
(n=223)
0.11
(−0.07, 0.29)
0.005 0.07
(−0.08, 0.23)
0.003 0.30
(0.58)
Log CRP
(n=225)
0.14
(−0.04, 0.32)
0.009 0.08
(−0.08, 0.25)
0.005 0.86
(0.35)
*

Number of standard deviations change of log(VAT) per standard deviation change of predictor Associations significant at <0.05 are in bold

**

The standardized TNF-alpha variable was created using the square-root of TNF-alpha

ˆ

Incremental increase in variance of marker explained (R-Squared) when VAT is added to age, study enrollment site, and BMI.

Chi-squared and P-value to test hypothesis that parameter coefficients for DXA-VAT and CT-VAT are the same (modified Hausmann test using suest command of Stata)