Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 23;37(9):881–891. doi: 10.1177/0333102416656118

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients and clinical outcome.

Compliance
Monthly migraine attack frequency
Patients Sex Age Number of sessions Before treatment After treatment
1 M 36 U 6 2
2 F 45 >90 3 2
3 M 32 >90 4 2
4 M 69 >90 4 3
5 F 45 31 4 2
6 F 46 MV MV MV
7 F 49 >90 2 2
8 F 59 Drop out
9 F 37 71 4 4
10 F 26 20 MV MV
11 F 22 46 5 2
12 F 18 5 1 0
13 F 40 35 5 5
14 F 26 87 3 2
> 30% of compliance (n = 10)
Number of attacks/ month MD SA
Before treatment 4.2 ± 1.1 7.3 ± 3.7 3 ± 2
First month of treatment 2.6 ± 1.3 4.8 ± 2.7 1.4 ± 1.6
Second month of treatment 2.8 ± 1.3 4.7 ± 2.3 1 ± 0.9
Third month of treatment 2.6 ± 1.2 5.4 ± 4.4 2 ± 1.8

MV: missing value; M: male; F: female; U: unknown; eTNS: external trigeminal nerve stimulation; PET: positron emission tomography; MD: Migraine Days; SA: Severe Attacks.

Patient 1 used the device more than 30% of the time but sent the device back long after the end of the trial. Thus, her compliance during the three months could not be assessed as she continued to use eTNS daily and the number of recorded sessions was >150.

Patients in grey had a migraine attack during PET1. Patient 14 had an attack during PET2 only, and all patients were pain free during PET3.