Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;3:2333721417724014. doi: 10.1177/2333721417724014

Table 2.

Measures.

Function Test Description Scoring Reliability
Standing balance Tandem Stance Participant stands heel to toe, or in half tandem heel to forefoot. Inability to stand for 10 s in half or full tandem predicts nursing home admission, and mortality (Guralnik et al., 1994). Two timed trials in full tandem stance of at least 5 s up to 30 s; if under 5 s, timed in half tandem up to 30 s. The best time in the most challenging position was used for analysis. Test reliability 0.76 (Guralnik et al., 1994)
Base of Support (BSW) Participant marches in place, stopping in comfortable stance; narrower stance predicts fall propensity in older adults (Swanenburg, Nevzati, Mittz, de Bruin, & Klipstein, 2013). Mean distance between heels across two trials Test reliability 0.77-0.95 (Swanenburg et al., 2013)
Reaching balance Functional Reach Participant reaches forward while maintaining stability; forward reach <7 in indicates limited ADLs, mobility (Weiner, Duncan, Chandler, & Studenski, 1992). Participant’s forward arm extension measured in upright stance and forward reach; used mean difference between the upright and extended reach on two trials. Test reliability 0.88 (Weiner et al., 1992)
Mobility Timed Up and Go (TUG) Seated participant rises to walk 3 yards and return to chair; risk of falls for community dwelling adults >13.5 s (Shumway-Cook, Brauer, & Woollacott, 2000). Practice trial; used timed second trial Test reliability 0.97-0.99 (Steffens, Hacker, & Mollinger, 2002)
Activity difficulty and priorities OPTIMAL instrument Self-report on experienced difficulty in a range of everyday actions, including self-identified priorities; scores correlate with physical therapist diagnoses (Guccione et al., 2005). For this study, 13 mobility items were selected for relevance from original 21. Total score across 13 items rated for difficulty, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty. Participant’s identified priorities categorized as worse, unchanged, or better at posttest. Test reliability 0.85-0.94 (Guccione et al., 2005)