Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 9;330(7495):812. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38370.496632.8F

Table 3.

Results of sensitivity analyses for deaths attributable to passive smoking

General population
Hospitality employees
Exposed at work
Exposed at home
Assumption applied 20-64 years exposed at home All workforce exposed at work ≥65 years exposed at home Fifth of pub, bar, nightclub workers Fifth of hotel and restaurant workers All pub, bar, nightclub workers All hotel and restaurant workers
Lower 95% confidence limit*






Subtotal 1684 204 4357 11 11 18 47
Difference (%)
−1454 (−44)
−3602 (−45)
−32 (−59)§

Upper 95% confidence limit*






Subtotal 3683 1085 11426 33 46 40 102
Difference (%)
1426 (43)
3467 (44)
25 (46)§

Relative risk for stroke equivalent to relative risk for ischaemic heart disease




Subtotal 2532 518 6860 22 26 27 70
Difference (%)
−293 (−9)
−1099 (−14)
−6 (−10)§

Australian prevalence plus smoking regulations as in Republic of Ireland




Subtotal 2211 0 5384 0 0 24 61
Difference (%) −1131 (−34) −2575 (−32) −54 (−100)§
*

Taken from Woodward and Laugesen.15

Difference relative to equivalent figures in table 2.

For all aged 20-65 years.

§

For workplace exposure in all hospitality employees.

Figures for prevalence from White et al28; all workplaces in Republic of Ireland are now smoke free.