Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 30;267(6):551–565. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0760-z

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the three groups: borderline personality disorder (BPD), non-patient comparison individuals (NPC), and cluster-C personality disorder (CPD)

BPD
(n = 48)
NPC
(n = 39)
CPD
(n = 21)
Test statistics
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD F p
Age (years) 30.79 9.21 28.67 10.70 31.48 11.80 0.67 0.512
Estimated IQa 96.88 10.08 100.73 11.38 98.45 9.26 1.45 0.239b
Brief symptom inventory 1.68 0.55 0.13 0.13 1.11 0.43 142.19 <0.001c
BPD checklist 118.44 25.58 50.68 5.21 74.80 17.31 135.21 <0.001c
Interview traumatic events childhood 8.85 <0.001d
 Sexual abuse 9.44 8.85 0.13 0.42 2.26 5.43 21.21 <0.001
 Physical abuse 17.15 12.40 1.69 3.61 7.00 10.95 23.68 <0.001
 Emotional abuse 20.35 8.93 2.47 3.32 13.06 8.49 54.52 <0.001
 Emotional neglect 11.28 6.99 0.82 2.07 6.14 6.55 31.66 <0.001
 Physical neglect 10.68 9.42 0.88 2.82 4.35 6.90 17.67 <0.001
Dissociatione 5.00 <0.01f
 Prior scanning 19.81 19.41 5.18 6.60 6.37 6.98 13.55 <0.001g
 Post scanning 31.87 26.85 6.40 7.81 15.36 20.60 16.02 <0.001g
% n % n % n χ2 p
Education levelh 7.70 0.02i
 Level 1 22.9 11 17.9 7 14.3 3
 Level 2 14.6 7 5.1 2 19.0 4
 Level 3 27.1 13 10.3 4 28.6 6
 Level 4 4.2 2 5.1 2 14.3 3
 Level 5 25.0 12 43.6 17 14.3 3
 Level 6 6.3 3 17.9 7 9.5 2
Handedness 6.00 0.20j
 Left 8 4 5 2
 Right 86 41 95 37 100 21
 Mixed 6 3
Axis I disorders
 Major depressive disorder 87.5 42 61.9 13 5.92 0.02
 Dysthymic 8.3 4 4.8 1 0.28 0.60
 Bipolar type II 2.1 1 0.44 0.51
 Generalized anxiety disorder 4.2 2 4.8 1 0.12 0.91
 Panic disorder with agoraphobia 12.5 6 2.88 0.09
 Panic disorder 12.5 6 14.3 3 0.41 0.84
 Agoraphobia 8.3 4 1.86 0.17
 Specific phobia 18.8 9 4.8 1 2.31 0.13
 Social phobia 31.2 15 23.8 5 0.39 0.53
 Obsessive compulsive disorder 14.6 7 9.5 2 0.33 0.57
 Posttraumatic stress disorder 35.4 17 14.3 3 3.17 0.08
 Somatoform disorder 10.4 5 19.0 4 0.96 0.33
 Eating disorders 35.4 17 33.3 7 0.03 0.87
 Substance abuse 43.8 21 4.8 1 10.23 0.001
 Intermitted explosive disorder 2.1 1 0.44 0.51
Axis II disorders
Avoidant PD 43.8 21 71.4 15 4.49 0.03
 Dependent PD 14.6 7 9.5 2 0.33 0.57
 Obsessive compulsive PD 20.8 10 33.3 7 1.23 0.27
 Passive aggressive PD 6.2 3 1.37 0.24
 Depressive PD 25.0 12 9.5 2 2.16 0.14
 Paranoid PD 29.2 14 7.68 <0.01
 Schizotypal PD 2.1 1 0.44 0.51
 Schizoid PD 2.1 1 0.44 0.51
Medication
 Antidepressants 64.6 31 36.4 8 4.17 0.04
 Antipsychotics 10.4 5 2.36 0.13
 Hypnotics 4.2 2 0.90 0.34
 Mood stabilizers 2.1 1 0.44 0.51

aAssessed with four subtasks of the WAIS (i.e., vocabulary, similarities, block design, and matrix reasoning)

bData of one NPC was not available

cAll three groups significantly differed from each other (p < 0.001). Data of two NPC and one CPD patient were not available

dMANOVA and ANOVAs showed significant group differences over the childhood traumatic events. BPD patients reported more traumatic events than either CPD patients or NPC with respect to sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect (all ps < 0.01). CPD patients reported more traumatic events than NPC with respect to emotional abuse and emotional neglect (all ps < 0.01). Data from seven NPC and one CPD patient were not available

eMeasured with the four somatic dissociation items of the Dissociation-Tension-Scale (i.e., derealization and change in perception of one’s body, hearing, and pain)

fTwo-way mixed-design ANOVA showed a significant group × time interaction. In BPD patients, the increase in reported dissociative states was significantly larger than in NPC (p = 0.001). Data from five BPD patients, two NPC, and one CPD patient were not available

gANOVA showed a significant group effect over dissociation. BPD patients showed increased level of dissociation as compared to NPC (p < 0.001) as well as to CPD group (p < 0.001)

hLevel of education of both the Dutch and German educational systems was translated into the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED), and in the current study, six levels of education were divided ranging from lower secondary school to Master’s degree

iValue is based on the Kruskal–Wallis test. Data of one NPC was not available

jValue is based on the Chi-square goodness-of-fit test