Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 17;83(17):e00969-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00969-17

TABLE 2.

Switchgrass composition for raw, nontreated material and material exposed to two microbial and hydrothermal treatments

Switchgrass Treatmenta Glucan
Xylan
Arabinan
Inert material
Concn (%)b Mass (g)c Concn (%) Mass (g) Concn (%) Mass (g) Concn (%) Mass (g)
COMT3(−) Raw 36 ± 0.8 1.8 26 ± 1.3 1.3 3.9 ± 0.3 0.2 34 ± 2.4 1.7
T→M→T→M 46 ± 1.3 0.7 17 ± 0.8 0.4 0.8 ± 0.0 0.0 37 ± 2.1 0.5
COMT3(+) Raw 34 ± 7.0 1.7 26 ± 0.3 1.3 3.5 ± 0.1 0.2 37 ± 0.9 1.9
T→M→T→M 45 ± 1.2 0.6 11 ± 0.2 0.1 NDd 0.0 44 ± 1.4 0.5
MYB WT Raw 37 ± 1.4 1.8 24 ± 0.3 1.1 2.6 ± 0.1 0.1 37 ± 1.6 1.9
T→M→T→M 60 ± 0.9 1.3 12 ± 0.4 0.3 ND 0.0 27 ± 1.3 0.6
MYB Trans Raw 37 ± 1.6 1.9 25 ± 0.3 1.3 3.3 ± 0.4 0.2 35 ± 1.5 1.7
T→M→T→M 53 ± 1.1 0.9 8.8 ± 0.4 0.2 ND 0.0 38 ± 1.3 0.7
Cave-in-Rock Raw 37 ± 1.1 1.9 25 ± 0.8 1.2 3.2 ± 0.3 0.2 35 ± 2.1 1.8
T→M→T→M 55 ± 1.4 0.9 8.6 ± 0.2 0.1 ND 0.0 36 ± 1.5 0.5
a

M, microbial treatment; T, hydrothermal treatment. Switchgrass was washed following each treatment step, and the material after washing was used for the next planned treatment.

b

Values are means ± standard deviations.

c

The average mass compositional values were calculated based on a 5-g/liter initial loading.

d

ND, none detected.