Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 29;42(10):2087–2095. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.28

Table 3. Putamen Volume Moderates The Relationship Between Peer Feedback And Anhedonia Severity At The 3-Month Follow-Up Assessment (n=37).

  b (SE) t p CI95
Left putamen model: F(7,29)=7.66, p<0.001; R2=0.59
 Baseline anhedonia 0.40 (0.14) 2.87 0.01 0.11, 0.68
 Baseline depression −0.04 (0.07) −0.50 0.62 −0.18, 0.11
 Baseline anxiety −0.001 (0.06) −0.01 0.99 −0.12, 0.12
 Total intracranial volumea 1.74 (0.92) 1.89 0.07 −0.15, 3.62
 Accept −0.06 (0.06) −0.95 0.35 −0.18, 0.07
 Left putamena −2.97 (0.84) −3.55 0.001 −4.68, −1.26
 Accept × left putamena 0.16 (0.07) 2.21 0.03 0.01, 0.30
         
Right putamen model: F(7,29)=13.78, p<0.001; R2=0.57
 Baseline anhedonia 0.36 (0.14) 2.63 0.01 0.08, 0.64
 Baseline depression −0.03 (0.06) −0.50 0.62 −0.16, 0.10
 Baseline anxiety −0.01 (0.05) −0.11 0.91 −0.11, 0.10
 Total intracranial volumea 1.52 (0.85) 1.80 0.08 −0.21, 3.26
 Accept −0.05 (0.06) −0.90 0.38 −0.18, 0.07
 Right putamena −2.82 (0.65) −4.32 0.0002 −4.15, −1.48
 Accept × right putamena 0.14 (0.06) 2.27 0.03 0.01, 0.27

Note: accept/reject=subjective rating on the chatroom task after peer feedback (0–100); Mood and Feelings Questionnaire=Depression; Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children=Anxiety; Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale=anhedonia.

a

Included standardized values as variables.