Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2017 Sep;127(3):502–514. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001719

Table 1.

Pooled Data for Opioid-Sensitive Inputs to Inspiratory and Expiratory Phase Duration

Study Input source Input to TI Input to TE
preBötC FpreBötC *−0.12 (−0.29 to 0.06) 0.15 (0.04 to 0.34)
FNon-preBötC 0.57 (0.14 to 0.97) #1.39 (0.73 to 2.27)
tPBN FPBN 0.39 (0 to 0.63) 0.60 (0.33 to 0.72)
FNon-PBN 0.22 (−0.03 to 0.47) 0.61 (0.26 to 1.01)

Inputs modulating phase duration (F) were computed separately for inspiratory (TI) and expiratory (TE) duration from our current study in the parabrachial nucleus (tPBN) and our previous study in the preBötzinger Complex (preBötC) 23. There were no differences between young and adult animals (P=0.69 for TI, P=0.385 for TE). Values for both age groups were pooled in the table for readability. Negative inputs increases respiratory phase duration; positive inputs decrease respiratory phase duration.

*

: preBötC input to TI (FpreBötC) was significantly different from pontine (P=0.024).

#

: FNon-preBötC inputs to TE were significantly larger than FpreBötC (P=0.0003). Differences in magnitude between FNon-preBötC and FPBN to TI and TE suggest additional opioid-sensitive inputs from other brainstem sites but this was not statistically significant. Median (25–75% range); mixed linear model with fixed effects age, study and input source.