Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mutat. 2017 Apr 19;38(9):1259–1265. doi: 10.1002/humu.23198

Table 2.

Performance comparision for Allele-specific Expression Prediction task (sorted by emVar auROC)

Participant
(Lab-Submission)
LogSkew Spearman corr. emVar auPRC emVar auROC
4 (EnsembleExpr) 0.449760 0.452561 0.655261
5-1(deltaSVM) 0.333893 0.409730 0.626850
DeepSEA Not Applicable 0.389 0.589
5-2(deltaSVM) 0.342004 0.369083 0.577220
7 0.007343 0.431639 0.562854
6-1 0.217845 0.345064 0.561953
6-2 0.190123 0.354726 0.561776
1-3 NaN* 0.311243 0.556499
1-1 NaN* 0.305258 0.550820
1-2 0.030243 0.295886 0.550048
2-3 −0.015476 0.303051 0.545206
1-5 0.056143 0.284863 0.541216
1-4 0.079049 0.293321 0.530856
3 0.030049 0.284356 0.511181
1-6 0.105376 0.286584 0.510103
2-2 −0.007377 0.249473 0.479746
2-1 −0.024347 0.234723 0.477301
2-5 −0.023092 0.233144 0.472651
2-6 −0.023092 0.233144 0.472651
2-4 −0.023092 0.233144 0.472651
*

every variant was assigned the same score, leading to incalculable Spearman correlations