Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 17;17:661. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4677-x

Table 1.

Model fit statistics of latent class analysis on five physical activity variables

Number of classes
2 3 4 5 6 7
Female
 LL (df) − 1775.94 (11) − 1764.61 (17) − 1759.01 (3) − 1751.58 (29) − 1749.54 (5) − 1748.20 (6)
 AIC 3573.88 3563.21 3524.02 3561.15 3509.09 3508.41
 BIC 3622.43 3638.24 3537.26 3689.14 3531.15 3534.89
 SSABIC 3587.50 3584.27 3527.74 3597.08 3515.28 3515.84
 Entropy 0.0 0.80 0.82 0.79 0.82 0.81
 No. of sig. residuals 1 1 1 0 0 0
 LRT 165.07 22.09 46.61 14.49 123.07 8.45
p .00 .00 .00 .30 .00 .00
Male
 LL (df) − 1114.78 (11) − 1102.69 (2) − 1094.99 (3) − 1087.43 (4) − 1085.99 (5) − 1085.29 (6)
 AIC 2251.55 2209.38 2195.97 2182.86 2181.99 2182.59
 BIC 2295.07 2217.29 2207.84 2198.69 2201.77 2206.32
 SSABIC 2260.17 2210.95 2198.32 2185.99 2185.91 2187.28
 Entropy 1.00 0.92 0.94 0.90 0.84 0.90
 No. of sig. residuals 2 0 0 0 0 0
 LRT 66.03 1760.52 26.58 37.33 455.34 23.92
p .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

LL(df) loglikelihood value and associated degrees of freedom, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, BIC Bayesian information criteria, SSABIC sample size adjusted Bayesian information criterion, LRT Lo-Mendell-Rubin adjusted likelihood ratio test value