Table 3.
Exposure | Child’s MVPA in Year 4 (mins/day) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Mean difference (95% CI) |
Boys Mean difference (95% CI) |
Girls Mean difference (95% CI) |
P for gender interaction | ||
Parent’s MVPA in Year 4 (mins/day) | N = 1223 | N = 556 | N = 667 | ||
Female parent | Model 1 | 0.16 (0.08, 0.24) | 0.15 (0.02, 0.29) | 0.16 (0.08, 0.25) | 0.90 |
Model 2 | 0.16 (0.08, 0.23) | 0.16 (0.03, 0.28) | 0.16 (0.07, 0.25) | 0.94 | |
Male parent | Model 1 | 0.08 (−0.01, 0.16) | 0.06 (−0.10, 0.21) | 0.10 (0.01, 0.18) | 0.67 |
Model 2 | 0.08 (−0.01, 0.17) | 0.06 (−0.11, 0.23) | 0.10 (0.00, 0.19) | 0.57 | |
Parent’s MVPA in Year 1 (mins/day) | N = 685 | N = 323 | N = 362 | ||
Female parent | Model 1 | 0.04 (−0.04, 0.12) | −0.04 (−0.22, 0.14) | 0.09 (−0.01, 0.18) | 0.22 |
Model 2 | 0.04 (−0.05, 0.12) | −0.03 (−0.22, 0.16) | 0.08 (−0.02, 0.17) | 0.32 | |
Male parent | Model 1 | −0.01 (−0.06, 0.03) | −0.03 (−0.10, 0.04) | 0.06 (−0.00, 0.12) | 0.05 |
Model 2 | −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04) | −0.03 (−0.10, 0.04) | 0.06 (−0.01, 0.13) | 0.07 |
aModel 1 is adjusted for child’s age at Year 4 and gender; Model 2 is additionally adjusted for the child’s BMI z score, number of siblings, household IMD score and the female/male parent’s age and BMI at Year 4 for models with parent’s sedentary time in Year 4 as the exposure, or for child’s BMI z score, number of siblings, household IMD score and the female/male parent’s age and BMI at Year 1 for models with the parent’s sedentary time in Year 1 as the exposure