Table 3.
Reclassification using common treatment cut-points.* Each cell represents the predicted risk group for each study participant by the different prediction techniques.
| ASCVD | Regression Recalibrated | VARS-CVD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | Total | |
| Low (≤3%) | 19,750 (24.4%) | 61,340 (75.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 78,195 (96.4%) | 2,895 (3.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 81,090 |
| Medium (3–9%) | 3,277 (1.4%) | 230,173 (98.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 46,494 (19.9%) | 186,414 (79.9%) | 542 (0.2%) | 233,450 |
| High (>9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 145,451 (76.8%) | 44,030 (23.2%) | 14 (0.01%) | 118,538 (62.6%) | 70,939 (37.4%) | 189,491 |
Cut-points use 5-year cut-points of 3% and 9% 5-year risk, which closely approximate the 7.5% and 20% cut-points seen in current guidelines.