Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr 30;27(1):32–40. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4375-6

Table 3.

Conventional ROC analysis to distinguish metastasis from haemangioma

Reader Technique Sensitivity Specificity ROC-AUC
1 Gadoxetic acid 89/104 86 % (77–94 %) 12/16 75 % (45–100 %) 0.87 (0.72–1.00)
Gadoxetic acid + gadofosveset 102/104 98 % (95–100 %) 16/16 100 % (79–100 %)* 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
P value P=0.0002* P = 0.125* P=0.0084*
2 Gadoxetic acid 94/103 91 % (84–98 %) 11/16 69 % (40–100 %) 0.92 (0.87–0.97)
Gadoxetic acid + gadofosveset 102/103 99 % (97–100 %) 16/16 100 % (79–100 %)* 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
P value P=0.0078* P=0.063* P=0.0084*

Numbers indicate lesions that were used for calculating the percentages with 95 % confidence intervals (in parenthesis). Sensitivities and specificities are calculated using confidence ratings 0–2 vs 3–4 as the cut-off. Asterisks indicate 95 % confidence intervals or P values that are unadjusted for clusters because GEE models did not attain convergence. P values < 0.05, shown in bold, indicate statistically significant differences

ROC receiver-operating characteristic, AUC area under the curve