Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2017 Apr 28;79(4):1076–1095. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12403

Table 4.

Models of the Relationship between Attitudes and the Hazard of Non-Marital Unintended Pregnancy

Zero Parity Parity one
1 2 3 4

Perceived Norms
X X
Mechanisms: Respondent Attitudes
 Sex 1.02 (.18) 1.04 (.17) 0.71 (.24) 0.69 (.19)
 Birth Control 0.77 (.13) 0.80 (.13) 0.89 (.26) 0.91 (.22)
 Baby 0.98 (.17) 0.94 (.17) 1.40 (.47) 1.38 (.39)
Constant 0.02 (.13) 0.08 (.42) 0.00 (.00) 0.00 (.00)
Chi square 82.21 102.04 24.14 49.11
p 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.05
Log likelihood −685.44 −675.13 −250.42 −237.59
Person weeks 43853 43853 4883 4883

Notes: All columns represent a logistic regression model. Results are presented as odds ratios. Standard errors in parentheses. Each model controls for relationship, socio-demographic characteristics, prior related experiences, months in study, months in study squared, and number of completed surveys. These controls are not presented for parsimony.

Columns 1 and 3 present results from models including just respondents’ attitudes and the controls. Columns 2 and 4 present results from similar models, but including all ten perceived norms (adults’ and friends’ injunctive and descriptive) as well.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001; one-tailed tests