Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;13(8):e1005702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005702

Fig 3. Mechanism of ligand concentration preferences by switching attraction and repulsion.

Fig 3

(A) Phase diagram depicting parameter regions of the four chemotactic response patterns. The dashed lines indicate critical lines corresponding to a ratio of h(DA/kA) to h(DI/kI). Because h(D/k) is a monotonically decreasing function of D/k (inset), the critical lines move with changes in DA/kA and DI/kI. (B-E) Various chemotactic responses (i.e., ΔE/E*) to guidance cue concentrations were derived: (B) bidirectional repulsion-to-attraction, (C) unidirectional repulsion, (D) unidirectional attraction and (E) bidirectional attraction-to-repulsion (BAR). Dashed arrows indicate the direction of concentration changes resulting from attractive or repulsive migration. In the BAR response, the x-intercept indicated by the black arrow corresponds to the preferred guidance cue concentration. The model parameters are listed in Table 1.