Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 7;24(6):1274–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.005

Table 6.

Effect of grafting technique on fruit yield and quality of tomato plants under different levels of water stresses.

Grafting treatment Water stress level (% ETc) Total yield (kg/m2) TSS (%) TA (%) Vitamin C (mg/100 g)
First season 2011/2012
Grafted 100 16.12 5.05 0.49 16.65
80 12.67 5.75 0.56 19.32
60 10.28 5.67 0.54 18.57
Non-grafted 100 14.70 5.53 0.49 18.02
80 12.48 5.23 0.54 17.45
60 8.88 5.95 0.61 19.40
LSD 0.05 1.70 1.27 0.11 4.15



Second season 2012/2013
Grafted 100 16.31 4.97 0.48 16.75
80 12.80 5.70 0.56 19.48
60 10.66 5.72 0.57 18.68
Non-grafted 100 15.19 5.47 0.50 18.25
80 12.86 5.37 0.54 17.50
60 9.06 5.98 0.63 19.62
LSD 0.05 2.05 1.02 0.14 4.47