Skip to main content
Neuroscience Bulletin logoLink to Neuroscience Bulletin
. 2014 Feb 10;30(3):441–450. doi: 10.1007/s12264-013-1401-4

Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study

Yingjun Lu 1,, Jingmei Wang 1, Ling Wang 1, Junli Wang 1, Jinliang Qin 1
PMCID: PMC5562603  PMID: 24526658

Abstract

Animation creates a vivid, virtual world and expands the scope of human imagination. In this study, we investigated the time-courses of brain responses related to the evaluation of the attractiveness of cartoon faces using the event-related potential (ERP) technique. The results demonstrated that N170 amplitude was higher for attractive than for unattractive cartoon faces in males, while the opposite was found in females. Facial attractiveness notably modulated the late positive component (LPC), which might reflect the task-related process of aesthetic appraisal of beauty. The mean LPC amplitude in males was significantly higher for attractive cartoon faces than for unattractive faces, while the LPC amplitude in females did not significantly differ between attractive and unattractive cartoon faces. Moreover, the paint mode (computer graphics, gouache, and stick figure) modulated the early encoding of facial structures and the late evaluative process. The early modulation effect by paint mode may be related to the spatial frequency of the pictures. The processing speed and intensity in females were both higher than those in males. In conclusion, our study, for the first time, reported ERP modulation based on the assessment of cartoon facial attractiveness, suggesting the facilitated selection of attractiveness information at the early stage, and that the attentional enhancement of attractive faces at the late stage only exists in males. This suggests that men’s brains are hard-wired to be sensitive to facial beauty, even in cartoons.

Keywords: facial attractiveness, cartoon face, eventrelated potential, gender difference, late positive component, N170, vertex positive potential

References

  • [1].Dekowska M, Kuniecki M, Jaskowski P. Facing facts: neuronal mechanisms of face perception. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2008;68:229–252. doi: 10.55782/ane-2008-1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Koscinsk K. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol Rev. 2007;70:45–79. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Maldonado CC, Bentley AJ, Mitchell D. A pictorial sleepiness scale based on cartoon faces. Sleep. 2004;27:541–548. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.3.541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Lagattuta KH, Sayfan L, Monsour M. A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: children and adults find happy-sad more difficult than daynight. Dev Sci. 2011;14:481–489. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Ren PJ. Effects of cartoons on violence liability in Chinese children. J Nanjing Uni (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences) 2002;148:153–160. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Rosset DB, Santos A, Da Fonseca D, Poinso F, O’Connor K, Deruelle C. Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32:212–218. doi: 10.1080/13803390902971123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Wang L, Wang JM, Wang JL, Lu YJ. A Comparative eventrelated potential study on recognition of cartoon face and real face. Psychol Rev. 2012;5:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Tong F, Nakayama K, Moscovitch M, Weinrib O, Kanwisher N. Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000;17:257–280. doi: 10.1080/026432900380607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Chen H, Russell R, Nakayama K, Livingstone M. Crossing the’ uncanny valley’: adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception. 2010;39:378–386. doi: 10.1068/p6492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Han SH, Jiang Y, Glyn WH. Watching cartoons activates the medial prefrontal cortex in children. Chinese Sci Bull. 2007;52:3371–3375. doi: 10.1007/s11434-007-0505-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Ishizu T, Ayabe T, Kojima S. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study. Int J Neurosci. 2008;118:955–966. doi: 10.1080/00207450701769398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Jemel B, Schuller AM, Cheref-Khan Y, Goffaux V, Crommelinck M, Bruyer R. Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. Neuroreport. 2003;14:2035–2039. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200311140-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Johnston VS, Oliver-Rodriguez JC. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. J Sex Res. 1997;34:188–198. doi: 10.1080/00224499709551884. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Langeslag SJ, Jansma BM, Franken IH, Van Strien JW. Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biol Psychol. 2007;76:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Feng CL, Wang LL, Wang NY, Gu RL, Luo YJ. The time course of implicit processing of erotic pictures: an eventrelated potential study. Brain Res. 2012;1489:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Feng CL, Wang LL, Liu C, Zhu XR, Dai RN, Mai XQ, et al. The time course of the influence of valence and arousal on the implicit processing of affective pictures. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J. Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol. 2008;77:247–265. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendrick AM, Regard M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ. Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage. 2002;16:663–677. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Luo YF, Zhou S, Yin J, Lv TM, Lu BX, Liu I, et al. Facial beauty processing revealed by spatiotemporal pattern of event-related potentials. J Fourth Military Medical Uni. 2007;28:1711–1713. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Werheid K, Schacht A, Sommer W. Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol. 2007;76:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Peng L. Introduction to Cartoon. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].van Hooff JC, Crawford H, van Vugt M. The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011;6:477–485. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Mason MF, Tatkow EP, Macrae CN. The look of love: gaze shifts and person perception. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:236–239. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Marzi T, Viggiano MP. When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 2010;84:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Schacht A, Werheid K, Sommer W. The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008;8:132–142. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.2.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Bronstad PM, Russell R. Beauty is in the’ we’ of the beholder: greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations. Perception. 2007;36:1674–1681. doi: 10.1068/p5793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Hofel L, Jacobsen T. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? Int J Psychophysiol. 2007;65:20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Zhao L. ERPs Experiment Course. Nanjing: Southeast University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Shi L, Wu RJ, Xu CP, Zhang SW, Zhu HW, Liu ZX, et al. Neural mechanism of spatial frequency representation in face categorization: an ECoG study. Prog Biochem Biophys. 2010;37:786–793. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2010.00012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Halit H, de Haan M, Schyns PG, Johnson MH. Is highspatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? Brain Res. 2006;1117:154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Wang JL, Wang JM, Ren JT, Lu YJ. A comparative eventrelated potential study on cartoon face classification and perception processing. J Psychol Sci. 2013;36:320–327. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Gai Y, Li YJ, Zhu YS, Zhao L. Gender difference in face recognition. J Biomed Eng. 2009;26:47–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychol (Amst) 2009;131:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Proverbio AM, Brignone V, Matarazzo S, Del Zotto M, Zani A. Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Spicer KR, Platek SM. Curvaceous female bodies activate neural reward centers in men. Commun Integr Biol. 2010;3:282–283. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.3.11560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Zhang Y, Kong FC, Chen H, Jackson T, Han L, Meng J, et al. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89:1887–1893. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Winston JS, O’Doherty J, Kilner JM, Perrett DI, Dolan RJ. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Cloutier J, Heatherton TF, Whalen PJ, Kelley WM. Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20:941–951. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Chatterjee A, Thomas A, Smith SE, Aguirre GK. The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:135–143. doi: 10.1037/a0014430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Senior C. Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron. 2003;38:525–528. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00293-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Peng XH, Wei JH, Luo YJ, Zhao L, Wang GF. Brain processing component during face cognition—N170 revealed by event-related potentials. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) 2002;15:303–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Pallett PM, Link S, Lee K. New “golden” ratios for facial beauty. Vision Res. 2010;50:149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Stephen ID, Law Smith MJ, Stirrat MR, Perrett DI. Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. Int J Primatol. 2009;30:845–857. doi: 10.1007/s10764-009-9380-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Brown WM, Price ME, Kang J, Pound N, Zhao Y, Yu H. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:12938–12943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710420105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Li O, Chen H. The retrospect and prospect of facial attractiveness. Adv Psychol Sci. 2010;18:472–479. [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Lei X, Xu P, Luo C, Zhao JP, Zhou D, Yao DZ. fMRI functional networks for EEG source imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32:1141–1160. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Lei X, Ostwald D, Hu JH, Qiu C, Porcaro C, Bagshaw AP, et al. Multimodal functional network connectivity: an EEG-fMRI fusion in network space. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuroscience Bulletin are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES