. 2017 Aug 18;7:8694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07860-y

Table 1.

Comparison of matrix-matched calibration and solvent calibration.

Compound	Matrix	Concentration (mg L⁻¹)	Regression equation	R²	Slope of matrix/slope of solvent	LOD (mg kg⁻¹)	LOQ (mg kg⁻¹)
beta-cypermethrin	solvent	0.01–5	y = 8182.3x + 27.492	0.999	0.976	0.0016200	0.0054100
beta-cypermethrin	soil	0.01–5	y = 7984.9x + 19.872	1.000	0.976	0.0016200	0.0054100
pyriproxyfen	solvent	0.0005–5	y = 592254x + 57760	0.998	0.871	0.0000909	0.0003030
pyriproxyfen	soil	0.0005–5	y = 516082x + 32869	0.998	0.871	0.0000909	0.0003030
abamectin	solvent	0.001–5	y = 32915x + 49.149	0.999	0.689	0.0001900	0.0006330
abamectin	soil	0.001–5	y = 22689x − 90.948	0.999	0.689	0.0001900	0.0006330
diflubenzuron	solvent	0.001–5	y = 17032x + 404.55	0.999	0.888	0.0001650	0.0005500
diflubenzuron	soil	0.001–5	y = 15125x − 338.61	0.999	0.888	0.0001650	0.0005500
chlorothalonil	solvent	0.01–5	y = 14424x − 187.86	0.999	0.999	0.0019100	0.0063700
chlorothalonil	soil	0.01–5	y = 14417x − 213.66	0.999	0.999	0.0019100	0.0063700