Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 18;18:633. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4056-0

Table 2.

qRT-PCR validation of RNA-seq data

Locus tag qRT-PCR fold change (salt stress vs control) RNAseq fold change (salt stress vs control) RNAseq vs qRT-PCR p-value (salt stress) qRT-PCR fold change (osmotic stress) RNAseq fold change (osmotic stress) RNAseq vs qRT-PCR p-value (osmotic stress)
CCI6_RS21730a 2.100e 2.360 0.840 1.100 −6.000 0.012d
CCI6_RS17915a 3.120e 3.240 0.960 1.820e 1.980 0.870
CCI6_RS19875a 2.500e 4.910 0.03d 3.011e 11.210 0.023d
CCI6_RS17580a 3.140e 3.480 0.870 2.120e 1.520 0.560
CCI6_RS16000a 1.890e 2.183 0.930 −0.500 −1.200 0.040d
CCI6_RS18570c 1.320 1.230 0.240 1.511 1.380 0.720
CCI6_RS06495c 1.400 1.500 0.450 −1.310 −2.020 0.220
CCI6_RS02325b 3.500e 3.840 0.830 2.800e 3.860 0.620
CCI6_RS12340c −1.300 −4.000 0.023d 1.300 −9.000 0.026d
CCI6_RS08505a 3.230e 3.590 0. 753 1.150 1.051 0.972
CCI6_RS19950b 10.021 12.061 0.778 18.231 21.585 0.812

aUp-regulated genes under salt stress according to RNA-Seq analysis

bUp-regulated genes under both conditions according to RNA-Seq analysis

cNon-differentially expressed genes in the study according to RNA-Seq analysis

dIndicates that there is a statistically significant difference between fold change values determined by qPCR and RNA-seq

eIndicates a statistically significant qRT-PCR fold change value

The fold change values (salt vs control or sucrose vs control) determined from the RNAseq experiment were compared with the fold change values obtained from qRT-PCR experiments. For the qRT-PCR experiments, the ∆∆Ct method was used to determine the fold change. The rpsA gene was used as the normalizer for all of the qRT-PCR experiments. The fold change values for the RNA-seq experiments are based on two biological replicates whereas the fold change values for the qRT-PCR experiments are based on three biological replicates