Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 6;2017:3196059. doi: 10.1155/2017/3196059

Table 2.

Comparison of ophthalmic parameter measurement in MRI.

Responsive (n = 18) Unresponsive (n = 15) Control P
Exophthalmos value (mm) 22.50 ± 2.17∗∗# 20.82 ± 2.96∗∗ 13.98 ± 0.97 <0.001
Inferior rectus (mm) 5.89 ± 0.96∗∗# 4.86 ± 1.05∗∗ 3.41 ± 0.29 <0.001
Medial rectus (mm) 11.02 ± 2.41∗∗ 9.79 ± 1.32 7.77 ± 0.90 <0.001
Superior rectus (mm) 5.92 ± 1.93∗∗ 5.62 ± 1.42 3.28 ± 0.35 <0.001
Lateral rectus (mm) 10.37 ± 1.32∗∗ 10.21 ± 1.26∗∗ 7.70 ± 0.46 <0.001
EOM (mm) 32.62 ± 4.78∗∗# 29.67 ± 2.59∗∗ 22.02 ± 1.76 <0.001
Orbital fat (mm) 3.78 ± 0.47# 4.33 ± 0.65∗∗ 3.24 ± 0.28 <0.001
Inferior rectus/fat ratio 1.65 ± 0.30∗∗## 1.16 ± 0.24 1.12 ± 0.11 <0.001
EOM/fat ratio 9.09 ± 0.77∗∗## 7.29 ± 1.27 7.09 ± 0.39 <0.001

P < 0.05 versus control group; ∗∗P < 0.001 versus control group; #P < 0.05 versus unresponsive group; ##P < 0.001 versus unresponsive group.